JEFFERSON CITY — A group of clergy challenging Missouri’s restrictive abortion ban on religious grounds will appeal a lower court ruling to the state Supreme Court.
In a decision issued in June, ºüÀêÊÓƵ Circuit Judge Jason Sengheiser said Republican lawmakers who banned the health care procedure were not trying to impose their religious beliefs on everyone in the state, rejecting a lawsuit backed by more than a dozen Christian, Jewish and Unitarian Universalist leaders who support abortion rights.
The legal team representing the clergy, including Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the National Women’s Law Center, said the team is “ready to fight all the way to the Missouri Supreme Court to restore Missourians’ reproductive and religious freedom.â€
People are also reading…
“Missouri’s abortion ban is a direct attack on the separation of church and state, religious freedom, and reproductive freedom,†the statement said. “Lawmakers made clear that they were imposing their personal religious beliefs on all Missourians when they enacted these laws. We remain committed to restoring abortion access in Missouri.â€
The clergy had last year prohibiting Missouri from enforcing its abortion law and a declaration that provisions violate the Missouri Constitution.
The law was approved by the Republican-led General Assembly in 2019 as many supporters pointed to their Christian faith as the reason for enacting the ban, making it effective only if Roe v. Wade was overturned.
Within minutes of the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, former Attorney General Eric Schmitt and Gov. Mike Parson, both Republicans, allowed the ban to go into effect.
In Missouri, it is now a felony punishable by five to 15 years in prison to perform or induce an abortion. Doctors also could lose their licenses. The law says women who undergo the procedure cannot be prosecuted.
Sengheiser wrote that there is similar, religious-based language in the preamble to the state constitution, which expresses “profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of the Universe.â€
“While the determination that life begins at conception may run counter to some religious beliefs, it is not itself necessarily a religious belief,†Sengheiser wrote. “As such, it does not prevent all men and women from worshipping Almighty God or not worshipping according to the dictates of their own consciences.â€
“We respectfully disagree with the circuit court’s decision, which noted that the case ‘presents an extremely difficult question,’†attorneys for the clergy said in their statement.
The group added that Sengheiser acknowledged the ‘historical inequality’ of upholding a total abortion ban based on laws passed in the 1800s, when women could not participate in the electoral and legislative process.